Posted on May 7, 2026 in Criminal Defense

Money laundering is the process by which illegally obtained funds are converted into “legitimate” funds. The term describes how “dirty” money is moved and disguised to appear “clean,” hence its origin. Both Arizona and federal laws make money laundering illegal.

In this blog post, we focus on Arizona’s money laundering laws. Specifically, we cover:

  • How Arizona defines money laundering
  • A comparison between Arizona and federal money laundering laws
  • Penalties for money laundering in Arizona
  • Possible defenses to a money laundering charge under Arizona law

AZ Defenders criminal defense attorneys represent persons charged in Arizona in state and federal court cases, including white-collar crimes such as money laundering. If you are facing money laundering charges in Arizona, call us at (480) 456-6400 or contact us online to speak with one of our experienced money laundering lawyers.

How Does Arizona Law Define Money Laundering?

Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) Section 13-2317 governs money laundering in Arizona. It breaks down money laundering activity into three levels, or degrees: first-degree, second-degree, and third-degree.

Relationship of Money Laundering to Racketeering Activities

Money laundering schemes often occur in the context of racketeering activities, which under ARS 13-2301(D)(4) include an assortment of white collar crimes, organized crime-related activities, and certain serious or violent crimes when they have a financial motivation.

Money laundering is an offense that can support a racketeering charge under ARS 13-2301(D)(4), and both crimes can be charged separately.

Examples of white collar crimes that can be connected to money laundering activity include:

Money Laundering: The Core of Criminal Networks

Examples of organized crime activities that can have a connection with money laundering include:

  • Extortion
  • Usury
  • Prostitution‑related offenses
  • Gambling offenses
  • Smuggling
  • Drug trafficking

Serious or violent crimes that can be linked to money laundering when they have a financial motive include:

Relationship of Money Laundering to Illegal Enterprises

A separate Arizona statute, ARS 13-2312, applies to enterprise-based crimes. For example, if a person uses racketeering or proceeds from racketeering activity to acquire or maintain control of an enterprise, like a corporation, limited liability company, partnership, or nonprofit company or association, this can qualify as an illegal enterprise.

It is possible to face charges for acquiring or controlling an illegal enterprise, racketeering, and money laundering as separate offenses in the same prosecution.

First Degree Money Laundering

Under ARS 13-2317(A), first‑degree money laundering applies to anyone who organizes, manages, supervises, or is in the business of money laundering, or who commits money laundering to facilitate terrorism or murder.

Second-Degree Money Laundering

Under ARS 13-2317(B), second-degree money laundering occurs when a person:

  • Acquires, maintains an interest in, transacts, transfers, transports, receives, or conceals the existence or nature of racketeering proceeds, while knowing or having reason to know that these proceeds come from the commission of a crime
  • Makes property available to someone else through a transaction, or by transporting it, or otherwise knowing that it is meant to be used in racketeering or to facilitate racketeering
  • Conducts a transaction while knowing or having reason to know that the property involved is the proceeds of a crime, and with the intent to conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of the property or to facilitate racketeering
  • Intentionally or knowingly making a false statement, misrepresentation, or false certification, or making a false entry or omitting a material entry in any application, financial statement, account record, customer receipt, report, or other document that is filed or required to be maintained under Arizona’s laws governing money transmission (ARS Title 6, Chapter 12)
  • Intentionally or knowingly evades, or attempts to evade, any reporting requirement under ARS 6-1220 and ARS 6-1242, whether by structuring transactions as described in 31 Code of Federal Regulations chapter X, or by causing any financial institution, money transmitter, trade or business to fail to file the report, by failing to file a required report or record or by any other means.
  • Intentionally or knowingly provides any false information or fails to disclose information that causes any licensee, authorized delegate, money transmitter, trade, or business to fail to file any report or record that is required under sections 6-1220 and 6-1242, or to file such a report or record that contains a material omission or misstatement of fact.
  • Intentionally or knowingly falsifies, conceals, covers up, or misrepresents or attempts to falsify, conceal, cover up, or misrepresent the identity of any person in connection with any transaction with a financial institution or money transmitter.
  • In connection with a transaction with a financial institution or money transmitter, intentionally or knowingly makes, uses, offers, presents, or attempts to make, use, offer, or present, whether accepted or not, a forged instrument, a falsely altered or completed written instrument, or a written instrument that contains any materially false personal identifying information.
  • If the person is a money transmitter, or is engaged in a trade or business or any employee of a money transmitter or a person engaged in a trade or business, that person intentionally or knowingly accepts false personal identifying information from any person or otherwise knowingly incorporates false personal identifying information into any report or record that is required by sections ARS 6-1220 and ARS 6-1242
  • Intentionally conducts, controls, manages, supervises, directs, or owns all or part of a money transmitting business for which a license is required by title 6, chapter 12, unless the business is licensed pursuant to title 6, chapter 12 and complies with the money transmitting business registration requirements under 31 United States Code section 5330.

As you can see, second-degree money laundering can cover a broad and complex assortment of activities. An experienced Arizona money laundering attorney can help you understand the prosecution’s case if it charges you with this level of money laundering and assist in preparing your defense.

Third-Degree Money Laundering

Under ARS 13-2317(C), third-degree money laundering occurs when a person intentionally or knowingly, in the course of a transaction, transmits money:

  • Confers or agrees to confer anything of value on a money transmitter or any employee of a money transmitter that is intended to influence or reward any person for failing to comply with any requirement under Title 6, Chapter 12
  • While engaged in the business of receiving money for transmission or transmitting money, receives anything of value on an agreement or understanding that it is intended to influence or benefit the person for failing to comply with any requirement under Title 6, Chapter 12

In simple terms, third-degree money laundering targets bribery and corruption within the money transmission industry — paying off or accepting payments to bypass Arizona’s money transmitter reporting and compliance laws.

Real-Life Examples of Money Laundering in Arizona

Here are some examples of money laundering taken from Arizona court cases.

Cases Involving Arizona’s Money Laundering Statute

  • An individual fraudulently solicited a $200,000 loan under a promissory note tied to a supposed investment transaction that was actually a theft-related scheme.
  • A person used a business to launder proceeds of narcotics trafficking, in which money laundering was alleged in connection with racketeering activity and a criminal enterprise.
  • A person was operating a prostitution business disguised as an escort operation, and tried to disguise the proceeds of this business as gambling winnings.
  • An individual created false medical and insurance records to obtain fraudulent payments, which were then laundered.

Cases Involving Federal Money Laundering Law

  • A bank branch manager helped to launder millions of dollars in illegal proceeds by creating “funnel accounts” to wire funds to another country.
  • A person created a multi-million-dollar cryptocurrency Ponzi scheme, using fake entities and layered transactions to conceal the scheme’s proceeds.

How Does Arizona’s Money Laundering Law Compare to Federal Money Laundering Charges?

Arizona’s money laundering law exists in parallel with the federal money laundering law. Depending on the circumstances, a person may face charges under either, or sometimes both, of these legal frameworks under the dual sovereignty doctrine.

The main distinction between the federal government’s and Arizona’s money laundering laws is that federal laws have a broader scope of potential application than Arizona’s law does. ARS 13-2317 applies to money laundering allegations that occur within Arizona’s borders. Federal laws apply to interstate and international money laundering.

So, for example, if a money laundering activity takes place in Arizona but involves laundering activities in other states or other countries, then to the extent that the money laundering violates Arizona’s law a person can be charged under ARS 13-2317 and can also be charged under federal laws like 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (laundering of monetary instruments) or 18 U.S.C. § 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity).

Federal money laundering investigations are conducted by federal law enforcement agencies, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Criminal Investigation Division. Factors that can influence whether federal authorities will bring charges can include:

  • Whether a substantial federal interest is involved, including the use of federal systems in the commission of the alleged offense
  • Whether the Arizona money laundering prosecution is adequate to address the alleged illegal activity, or if the case involves many victims outside Arizona or large sums of money
  • Whether the Arizona money laundering prosecution is already underway
  • Whether the Arizona money laundering case led to an acquittal (a separate prosecution under federal money laundering law does not constitute double jeopardy in this situation)

Penalties for Money Laundering Under Arizona Law

The applicable money laundering penalty under ARS 13-2317 depends on the degree of the charged offense. The legal consequences of a money laundering conviction can be severe, including prison time, significant fines, and the forfeiture of assets.

Penalties For First-Degree Money Laundering

A conviction for first-degree money laundering under Arizona law is a Class 2 felony. The applicable sentence will depend on factors including whether mitigating or aggravating considerations apply, and whether the conviction is a first or subsequent offense.

For example, aggravating factors include:

  • Large sums of money
  • Multiple victims
  • Sophisticated or ongoing schemes
  • Abuse of a position of trust
  • Prior criminal history

The court must find that at least two aggravating factors exist to exceed the presumptive sentence.

For a first‑time, felony offender, the sentencing range is as follows:

Sentence typePrison term
Mitigated3 years
Minimum4 years
Presumptive5 years
Maximum10 years
Aggravated12.5 years

If you have one historical prior felony conviction, the maximum sentence can be up to 23 years; if you have two or more historical prior felony convictions, the maximum sentence can be up to 35 years.

Penalties For Second-Degree Money Laundering

A conviction for second-degree money laundering under Arizona law is a Class 3 felony. For a first‑time felony offender, the sentencing range is:

Sentence typePrison term
Mitigated2 years
Minimum2.5 years
Presumptive3.5 years
Maximum7 years
Aggravated8.75 years

If you have an historical prior felony conviction, the maximum sentence increases to up to 16.25 years. If you have two or more historical prior felony convictions, the maximum prison time is up to 25 years.

Penalties For Third-Degree Money Laundering

A conviction for third-degree money laundering under Arizona law is a Class 6 felony. For a first-time felony offender, the sentencing range is:

Sentence typePrison term
Mitigated4 months
Minimum6 months
Presumptive1 year
Maximum1.5 years
Aggravated2 years

Additional Possible Penalties

Prison time is only part of the legal consequences you can face if you are convicted of a Class 2, Class 3, or Class 6 felony for money laundering. Here are some of the other possible penalties that may apply.

Possible Probation

Probation eligibility depends on the offense, whether it is designated dangerous, statutory exclusions, and a defendant’s criminal history.

Fines and Fees

Each count of a felony conviction, regardless of class, can result in a fine of up to $150,000, plus possible probation fees and surcharges.

Asset Forfeiture

A conviction for money laundering often results in forfeiture proceedings. These can include cash, bank accounts, vehicles, real estate, and other property that were involved in or derived from the money laundering activity.

Federal Prison Sentencing

By comparison, a conviction for money laundering as a federal offense can result in a sentence from 3 to 15 or more years, depending on the statute involved:

StatuteStatutory maximumTypical guideline reality
18 U.S.C. § 1956Up to 20 years per countOften 5–15+ years
18 U.S.C. § 1957Up to 10 years per countOften 3–10 years

Actual federal sentences depend on the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, offense level calculations, and judicial discretion.

Factors a federal court will consider in sentencing include:

  • The amount of money involved
  • The source of the laundered funds, such as from drugs or violent crimes
  • The sophistication of the money laundering activity
  • The defendant’s role in the money laundering activity
  • The criminal history of the defendant, if any

Fines in a federal money laundering case can be up to $500,000, or twice the value of the property involved in the money laundering activity.

Possible Money Laundering Defenses in Arizona

Depending on the circumstances involved in the government’s case, the following defenses may be available.

Lack of the Requisite Mental State

Money laundering requires proof that the defendant acted knowingly or intentionally, as defined by Arizona law, with respect to the property’s criminal origin or intended use. If you did not have this requisite knowledge, this can be an effective defense. 

A money laundering defense lawyer will scrutinize whether the prosecution’s evidence actually demonstrates the required mental state or merely shows that you were associated with individuals or transactions later found to be criminal.

Mere Association or Presence

This is a variation of the lack-of-requisite-mental-state defense. It is not a crime to be around someone who is engaged in money laundering, or to work for or be associated with a business that is connected with such activity, if you are not personally involved in it. This is also a possible defense to charges of racketeering or illegal enterprise activity.

No Traceability of the Proceeds to Money Laundering Activity

The money involved must be the proceeds of criminal activity. If you can show that the alleged funds were lawfully originated, this is a valid defense.

No Intent to Conceal or Disguise the Funds

Money laundering requires that the transactions involved were made with the intent to conceal or disguise the source, ownership, or control of the money. If you can show that these transactions were, in fact, open, ordinary, and transparent, with no effort to hide, falsify, or misrepresent involved, then you have a strong defense. Your defense attorney will work to present bank statements, transaction records, and other documentation showing the legitimate business explanation for the financial activity.

Legitimate Business Explanation

Especially in cases where the prosecution relies on circumstantial evidence to prove its case, if you can show that the financial activity was consistent with normal business operations, this may cast reasonable doubt on the prosecution’s evidence. A money laundering attorney experienced in navigating the legal process involved in these cases can develop a strong defense strategy tailored to the specific facts of your situation.

Overcharging

Sometimes it may be possible that the prosecution has charged you for first-degree money laundering when the offense is better categorized as second-degree, such as in cases in which you were not involved in organizing, leading, or managing the alleged criminal activities. This can result in reduced charges.

Insufficient Evidence

If the prosecution has insufficient evidence to establish that you knew the funds were connected to underlying criminal activity, this may form the basis for a strong defense. Prosecutors must prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt, and a skilled defense attorney will investigate the government’s evidence and identify weaknesses in the prosecution’s case. Challenging the prosecution’s evidence through independent forensic analysis of financial records is a common and effective defense strategy.

Illegal Search or Seizure

Money laundering charges often stem from searches and seizures of evidence, such as cash or financial records. If police do not follow proper procedures in seizing evidence, such as a lack of reasonable suspicion, probable cause, or having obtained a search warrant when necessary, this can all result in violations of your civil rights that can lead to the government’s evidence becoming “fruit of the poisonous tree” and being excluded from court.

Expiration of the Statute of Limitations

Although ARS 13‑107 generally provides a seven‑year statute of limitations for Class 2–6 felonies, money laundering offenses connected to racketeering activity may not be subject to any statute of limitations under ARS 13‑107(E).

The statute of limitations can be tolled under circumstances such as the accused’s absence from Arizona or, in some cases, when the accused’s identity is unknown. Still, generally, any money laundering charge that falls outside the statute of limitations cannot be charged against you.

Have You Been Charged With Money Laundering in Arizona?

Because people who engage in it often go to considerable lengths to hide their financial transactions, money laundering can be a complex activity that results in overlapping charges, including racketeering, illegal enterprise activity, and even dual federal and state prosecutions.

Defending against a money laundering charge can be correspondingly complex, requiring analysis of the charges and the evidence and the preparation of the strongest possible legal defense. Both Arizona and federal prosecutors can be aggressive in pursuing a conviction against you, and they can call on considerable government resources to aid them in that effort.

If you are facing this charge in Arizona, you need legal counsel from a law firm experienced in financial criminal cases. This is where AZ Defenders can help you.

Our attorneys have decades of combined experience defending Arizona residents in financial and white-collar crime cases. We understand the relevant laws and how they apply to a wide range of unique factual circumstances. We know how to navigate complex criminal defense litigation and can negotiate with prosecutors to build a strong defense strategy for our clients.

To speak with an experienced money laundering attorney, call AZ Defenders at (480) 456-6400 day or night to schedule a free consultation and case evaluation. You can also use our online contact form if you choose.

Contact Us

COMPLETE THE FORM BELOW FOR A FREE CONSULTATION

  • * required
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

What were you charged with? Enter the name or code of your charge to find legal resources.